Not everyone should wear #42 today. Here’s why.

mets 2011 jackie robinson day jersey jon niese metspolice.com

Not everyone should wear #42 today.

I am not here to diminish Jackie Robinson.  Quite the opposite.

What baseball has done is turn the 42 into just another stunt.   42 has been watered down into the realm of stars and stripes caps and camo jerseys and that’s terrible.

There is a really good solution which  I read it on the internet a few years back – so credit to whoever came up with this.

Pick ONE player (or in a variant idea a handful of players) and have that player be the one who has the honor of wearing Jackie’s number.

At some point today the Mets will send out the press notes and the beat reporters will read them  You will then see a barrage of tweets about how the players are going to wear 42.  Surprise.  42 is now as important as everyone tweeting the lineup.

On the broadcast 42 will get talked about.  Nice enough.

But imagine if MLB turned wearing 42 into an honor.  What if there were discussions about who should wear the number.

Play this out…

Say the Mets chose Curtis Granderson.  You get a press release about which Met (and Phille and Astro and Mariner…) will wear the number.  Curtis gets the honor but also the responsibility of wearing the number.  Curtis would be the Met chosen to spoke to the media about the importance of Jackie.   Why you Curtis? What does this mean to you?  Why is Jackie important?

In that scenario you get a focused tribute.

(Plus being cynical there’s a better chance of selling Granderson 42 jerseys than generics, but OK maybe that leads to my son asking me why someone at the Mets game has a Granderson 42 jersey.)

 

 

As time heads forward maybe a player with white skin would ask to be the one with the honor.  That would start a discussion of some kind, and maybe we could see how far we’ve come (or not).  If David Wright asked to be the one who wears 42 how would you react?  Is that good?  Does it harken back to Jackie and Pee Wee Reese?  Would it bother some that a white player not a black player wore the number?  I really could argue this one both ways – and that’s quite a discussion to be had.

Instead we’ll take what was originally a grand gesture and check he box.  It’s not bad that they do it, it just could be better.  Discuss!

Bored with Sports Talk Radio? Try Alternative Sports Talk via TuneIn


468 ad

24 Comments

  1. This is an excellent idea that has merit.  Make the Face of MLB contest a real contest, include the players and coaches along with the fans and the winner gets the honor and responsibility to wear the number with pride and dignity.

    Reply
  2. I agree with you, right now it’s a stunt.

    Reply
  3. metspolice So, essentially you are endorsing MLB’s original #42 plan. Which the teams and players rapidly discarded

    Reply
  4. cvelardi metspolice It would make it like an honor to wear #42 for a day.

    Reply
  5. metspolice it would be nice… could work much like the RC award given to one player for a specific reason…

    Reply
  6. metspolice In terms of who wore it, I wouldnt care about color – that’s the message your are trying to convey in the end #nopeimnotwhite

    Reply
  7. MikeEsposito5 metspolice It really would — I really, really like this idea. Too often, ‘marketers’ think bigger is better..

    Reply
  8. cvelardi metspolice Yeah i kno :(.Unfortunately, it makes it a publicity stunt and merchandise oppportunity like Mothers day &Fathers day.

    Reply
  9. metspolice I wear 42 on my hockey helmet and I’m white.

    Reply
  10. AmazinAvenue metspolice As do I.

    Reply
  11. .jenhasonen thats what people are telling me. even though it makes me look forgetful i think it strengthens the watered down argument

    Reply
  12. metspolice it would be interesting to find out why this idea was abandoned in favor of the current “EVERYONE IS 42!!!!” Shenanigans

    Reply
  13. metspolice and yes, it only reinforces your original question. As long as MLB didn’t allow fan voting, tweet voting, etc

    Reply
  14. .jenhasonen oh goodness – the people picking 42 would be awful.

    Reply
  15. metspolice jenhasonen i’m personally tired of players wearing 42..at this point it should be a patch or a hat with ’42’ on it..more subtle

    Reply
  16. Tommy_Karn metspolice I just don’t think the message gets across at all. 42 is everywhere so it’s easy to ignore if that makes sense

    Reply
  17. .jenhasonen Tommy_Karn That’s how I feel. The specialness has become rote.

    Reply
  18. .jenhasonen Tommy_Karn That’s how I feel. The specialness has become rote.

    Reply
  19. metspolice jenhasonen exactly..im just over it…plus, its super confusing and hard to tell who is who.. wear a patch or cap instead

    Reply
  20. Is that jersey supposed to be authentic? The number don’t look right to me.

    Reply
  21. @Dept of Corrections  Sure is! It’s my jersey that Shannon didn’t bother mentioning…

    Reply
  22. metspolice Hey, thanks for using the pic of my jersey without credit!

    Reply
  23. TezzaNYM  ha sorry, i just typed 42 into my images and that came up – must be an old You Own This

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>