John Franco disappointed he didn’t get more HOF votes

Marty Noble spoke with John Franco who is disappointed he didn’t get more HOF votes.

John seems like a nice guy and as we have discussed previously he is the Best Met of the 1990’s.

However, at no point in any Mets game did I ever once think either (a) “Now there’s a Hall of Famer” or even (b) “Here comes Franco, this game is over.”   He was rarely 1-2-3, more of a 1-2-3-4-5 save kinda guy.  Mix in a walk and a double to keep us listening to Fran Healy.

I haven’t forgotten about The Worst 50 Mets of All Time nor Make Our Own Old Timers Day.   Real Job has required me to actually work at work. It happens.

Tonight I’m just polishing off some existing posts and quite sleepy.

Meanwhile, Sports Police is finally coming together thanks to Chris who has been rocking it out this week.  We’re applying this formula to all the local teams – if you like hockey or the Jets there’s plenty up there for you this week.  Any big time Knicks fans looking to blog for the fun of it?  Hit me up at [email protected]

A look back at Mets uniforms (part 2)

Osh41 continues his series of looks back at Mets uniforms.

Inspired by ‘Mets Yearbook’ 1976 I present another look at Mets jerseys from the past – the 76/77 home and road.

Best way to describe the road version – WEIRD. The Mets script looks very different from the 74/75 versions (see yesterday’s post). According to the excellent MLB Game Worn jerseys of the Double-Knit Era (by William Henderson) the Mets changed unifrom manufacturers for the 76 and 77 seasons.

Maybe the new company wanted to put their own unique stamp on the uniform?   They sure did.

The jerseys look terrible.   Not as bad as the black but pretty close.  Another word to describe? SHABBY.

The home jersey thankfully was unaffected by the manaufacturer change.

Some notes from 1976 – on the home and road jerseys the Mets had a black armband memorializing the offseason passings of original team owner Joan Payson and original manager Casey Stengel. The team had previously worn black armbands during the 1972 season in memory of Gil Hodges who passed away from a heart attack just prior to the seasons start.

The team also wore bi-centennial patches on the right sleeves of the home and road jerseys. They also wore pillbox style caps throughout the season.

Next, the year was 1978 and the Mets were entering the first season of the post Seaver era.  So what did the Mets do?  That’s right they changed their uniforms!!

The 1978 -82 home and road 1978 -81 uniforms were a drastic departure from Mets uniforms from 1962-1977. Gone were the button up jerseys, they were replaced by a pullover style for home and road with two buttons at the top.  The sleeve edges and collars were graced by a blue/orange/blue border.

Hey it could have been worse, at least they kept wearing belts and not the awful snap pants like many other clubs of the era.

In 1979 the Mets introduced (much to my dismay) names to the backs of both road and home uniforms. The names were stitched to a nameplate and then stitched to the uniform backs which looked kind of awkward on the home pinstripes.

The rest of the MetsPolice and I are big advocates of the no name on back style at least at home: if you don’t know your team by uniform number alone you should rethink your fandom.  And hey Fred and Jeff: make people buy scorecards!

For fans of MetsPolice and my generation these uniforms represent absolute futility. Arguably the worst era in Mets history. Trust me on one you fans born post 1986. The early Mets of the 60’s were at least lovable.  They were an expansion team after all. They were expected to be bad. This uniform experienced no glory at all, just punch lines.

An interesting name in an interesting post

(a) I am really sick of Hall of Fame arguments

(b) if by the All Star break of 1998 you didn’t know steroids were all over the game you were kidding yourself. Oh, and you watched lots of Cardinals and Cubs games that year and made fun of Bob Costas for questioning why all the great home run hitters of all time played at the same time.

(c) if Andre Dawson is a HOFer then put Blyleven and Morris in. Who cares. It’s a museum. a museum that doesn’t include the all time leader in hits and wont include the single season and career hone run king. Seriously, who cares. Let Jack Morris fans look at an old uniform. Does it matter?

(d) of all the players Baseball Prospectus could have chosen in this paragraph…

Every year brings another ream of recriminations, because the process involves risking another exercise in hubris that leaves great, Hall-worthy careers unrecognized. What has been especially noxious this time around is the treatment of Jeff Bagwell from some quarters as he arrives on the ballot. What he has been subjected to is little better than character assassination, where even the lack of any actual evidence, any scintilla of contemporary complaint from the writers themselves, or the especially self-serving “he didn’t rat on teammates to me” tack is being held against him.* This approach will be on the landscape for years to come, so you may as well gear up for the witch hunts to come, against Mike Piazza or Jim Thome and so many others, no doubt using criteria every bit as tenuous or fantastic.

via Baseball Prospectus | Prospectus Perspective: Bagging on Bagwell.

The Times also weighs in on the subject and one of the players mentioned above. Hmmm.