$8.29 Billion Loss, $45B from Government, Why Not Name A Stadium?

Citi lost $8.29 billion last quarter.  $45 billion in government loans.  A $20 million check to the Mets.

Yes a deal is a deal, a contarct is a contract, but good business partners help each other – and I think the Mets would be wise to offer a statement announcing how they’ve reworked the deal with Citi to allow their good partner to get their feet on the ground without worrying about stadium naming rights.   Let Citi pay $21 million for 19 years or whatever needs to be done.

I actually couldn’t care less about Citi or the Mets balance sheet.  As a fan what I don’t want is to have the Mets play one year in Citi Field, three years in Barclay’s Stadium, a year in Mets Field, six months in Jackie Robinson Park and then some time at the Coca-Cola Grounds.  That’s why I hate corproate names. 

I still call buildings “Candlestick” and “Comiskey” and I still use terms like Triborough Bridge and West Side Highway.   Name something and stick with it.   Wrigley is a gum.   Doesn’t bother me.   Name it, keep it…and I worry about this deal the Mets did.  

A bad deal in Flushing?  Nah, never happen.

www.metspolice.com

The Mets Police
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.