
Good morning. I don’t feel like writing about chickens and I assume you had heard of R.A. Dickey before last weekend. There’s nothing new out there in the Metsosphere this morning so I’m going to dip into the generic pile..
…moving the A’s to New Jersey or Long Island or Brooklyn would solve another of baseball’s thorniest problems. The Yankees, by virtue of being in a media market vastly larger than anyone else’s, can bid up player salaries into the stratosphere with the assurance that it will get that money back with TV revenue. (The Mets should get the same benefit of the NYC media market, but have been held back by a factor that’s hard to legislate: incompetence.)
…
Splitting the New York market among three teams instead of two would dilute that advantage and help make for a more level playing field league-wide. This, of course, is why neither the Steinbrenners nor the Wilpons would allow the A’s to move to New York. (Unlike the Bay Area, which MLB has split into discrete A’s and Giants territories, the Mets and Yankees both have veto power over other teams moving into the New York metro area.) The Mets’ owners, ever protective of their territory, even rejected a much-needed payoff that would’ve allowed the Yankees’ top minor-league club to play in Newark for a year, leaving the team wandering homeless this season as the Empire State Yankees.
via Oakland A’s, San Jose move: Forget the West Coast. The A’s should move to New York..
Let’s for sake of argument put the New Jersey A’s in the AL East. Bounce Toronto to the Central and I guess KC to the West (the Astros will be pleased).
The A’s would draw well in their division games vs. the Yankees and baseball could always force some interleague between the NJA’s and the Mets and the Phillies. That’s 25 home games with pretty good crowds..better than many teams get now.
Location-wise I’m not sure where you’d put it. Meadowlands? Newark? New Brunswick?