Yankee Stadium vs. Citi Field (New Stadium Insider)

New Stadium Insider (a great blog) wrote about his recent trip to Citi Field.  It’s always fun to see the Mets ballpark through the eyes of a Yankee fan.
 
He’s got some pics and some insights, and like all Yankees fans will do chooses to lie to himself and say that New Yankee is better, even though we all know and they all know its not.
 
Here’s the story.   I love the NSI but he’s lying to himself.
 
 
 

Mailbag: Are The Shea Stadium Markers Misplaced By The New York Mets?

The post “Are The Shea Stadium Markers Misplaced By The New …“: has generated a lot of discussion.  I don’t know if they are or not – deep down I want to believe that they can’t possibly be, but what is interesting is that Mets fans don’t immediate;y discount this as hogwash.  Would anyone be surprised?   Sooner or later some engineer will post the definitive response – or one of the newspaper guys will need a column for an off-day and have better resources than the Mets Police.   

The first comment…

I do not believe that this photo method of measuring is accurate unless due to “perspective”.

Just take a picture of a ruler at an angle (yes the pictured he used here is at an angle), and you will see that the inches closer to the camera are “longer” than the inches furthest from the camera.

He is then in effect repeating the size of the “closer” inches on the rules in his illustration, and using them to simulate measurements at distances that are further away from the lens.

That being said, I am NOT claiming that the bases are in the proper place, just that THIS method cannot be used to make the determination. 


Brian says:

I had the same thoughts, and I’m still not sure.

As for the marker placements relative to the arch, here’s how I looked at it:

If you take the Shea picture cited and (literally) draw a straight line from home plate to the fence, it actually lands slightly to the right of the 410 marker. Or, put differently, the 410 marker skews to the left, relative to the plate. That means the picture was taken from slightly to the right of home plate (if you move to your right for a picture, things further away will skew to your left, relative to things closer to you). As a result, everything is slightly off to the left relative to things behind it (and more so as you go further back in the picture). So, home plate should actually line up with a point slightly further over to the right, either within or just to the right of the last arch at Citi.

As for Alex’s rough distance calculation, it’s a good attempt, but very rough and problematic. As you go further back in the picture, things that are actually far apart will, of course, naturally seem closer together. The amount of this effect will vary depending on your distance to the subject, the size of the subject(s), the angle of the picture, etc. So, unfortunately, it’s basically impossible to tell from this picture and this kind of calculation with a method as rough as the one Alex used. You could try to measure how many pixels per feet it is from home to the rubber, and then from the rubber to 2nd, but they’re so small in the picture that it probably won’t work. The same thing is true for comparing parking spot width near the plate to that of spots closer to where the 410 marker would be.

My own method, when these pictures first came out, was to go to Google and look at the satellite image of Shea. I spotted up 2nd and home relative to the now-defunct traffic circle and the road leading to it that comes under the highway, then compared those relations to where the markings are relative to the highway. Based on that rough eyeball job, it seems like they’re close enough to the right spots (in terms of distance to Citi) that you can’t say otherwise based on my method. But, it’s still entirely possible that they’re off by a couple of feet.

This goes without saying, but I’ll say it anyway:

If the markers actually are in the wrong spots, be it by 2 feet or 20 feet, and no matter in what respect they’re wrong (placement left to right, distance to Citi, whatever), there’s only one thing you can say about it: this could only happen to/with the Mets.

Posted by Brian to The Mets Police at May 31, 2009 12:04 AM 


Posted by Anonymous to The Mets Police at May 31, 2009 10:29 AM 

www.metspolice.com
@metspolice

Snappy Title New York Mets Links

(Insert snappy title here).
 
Some random stuff from this morning.   I guess this needs a catchy name like Applesauce has.  
 
I went over to UniWatch hoping they would be as upset as I am about yesterday’s hideous uniform combination.  I didn’t find what I wanted.  Instead I found this….
 
Curious how the Mets play in the heinous black?  Well in 2007 they played .760 on the road while dressed like a softball team.   
 
I’m still fascinated about how song selection makes players hit better, which is my column today over on Flushing University:  http://www.flushinguniversity.com/moxie/columns/make-some-noise-come-on-m.shtml which I will print here on Mets Police tomorrow.
 
Meanwhile the Daily News celebrates Jay Horwitz for being the Mets PR guy for 30 years, because when you think good public relations you think of the Mets.   http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/mets/2009/06/01/2009-06-01_bondy_horwitz_is_mets_man_in_middle.html
 
Finally – since I’d love to sit home on my deck and get paid to bitch about the Mets all day, I found this article with Matt Cerrone of MetsBlog quite interesting.  I don’t know Matt but he seems like a cool dude:  http://www.metsblog.com/2009/05/31/qa-me-and-metsblog/
 
(I think I’m just going to stick with Snappy Title New York Mets Links).
 
 

Guest Column: I Drank The Kool-Aid (No Demand On New York Mets Tickets)

A guest post from frequent contributor JMF:

There was no gun to my head.  The Mets didn’t force me to buy season’s tickets.  I could have said NO.  I attempted to downgrade my tix but my nice Mets salesman customer service was not real helpful as regards a downgrade.  When I asked him about moving to tix about 40% less expensive, i.e. Promenade gold right behind home plate he said they were all spoken for.  I’m sure had I told him that it was take it or leave it, or that I was NOT going to renew that he would have been more helpful.  Also, the Mets were smart in NOT letting me sit in my seats, because the truth is that they are not as close to the action as I had thought or expected.
Regardless, I figured that with a brand spanking new stadium and a reasonably interesting team that the worst that would happen with those tickets or games that I would not attend that I could, at least get back my cost or face value.
WRONG!
I have tix in Excelsior Silver or Caeser’s Silver, not sure what it is, and my average ticket is $125.00 a ticket, or $10,000+ per ticket for the entire season.    In previous years I had two partners, this year one backed out, and again, assuming I’d get back at least face value, I ended up with say 20 or so unaccounted for and now unsold games, beginning with a Phillies game in early June.  
The face value of those Phillies tix coming up are $150.00 per ticket, and they sit on StubHub at around 15% higher in hopes of recouping my cost of face value, and I can’t say I’m optimistic about that sale.  I have them on Craig’s List at $150.00 per ticket, and so far no takers.  The point here is…
If a June game against the Mets rivals can’t get face value, then what hope is there (in recouping my cost) for that $150 game this summer versus the DBACKS and the GIANTS?  
I know two Season’s Ticket holders that have many unsold games in Excelsior or Caeser’s GOLD and are even worse off.

I drank the Kool-Aid, but I promise that next year, NO WAY am I going to renew my tix and I bet there are a massive amount of Mets season’s ticket holders that are probably thinking the same thing, all the way down to even the cheaper seats because I’m crushed to say that Mets tickets still do not command any premium.
There will probably me a massive revolt (unless the Mets do incredible and get into The World Series) and exodus from overpriced Mets tix where season’s ticket holders lose money on any resale.
I also made the mistake of buying an Opening Day Plan, and paid fees because I ordered online, whereas had I called there would not have been fees.  
What happened?  Wasn’t there supposed to be tremendous interest in this new ballpark?   I guess the overpriced tickets and the economy have corrected this commodity.  
Like I said, I think that many of my fellow season’s ticket holders will be rethinking in 2010, and so should the Mets reconsider ticket prices as well.

I agree with JMF.   I know I have too many tickets (real life gets in the way) and I keep giving them away.  You would have thought there would have been demand – new stadium, good team, smaller park – but there’s none.   I’m not sure we all got greedy – I just wanted to make sure I was at Opening Day (cough, night) – so I bought tickets to 14 other games I didn’t really want. I went alone and sold the other seat for $200 which offset most of the package.   In 2008 I was able to “go for free” by selling off many games.   


What will you do in 2010?  Will you buy as many games?  I bet attendance goes down next year, even if they win it all and bring back Tom Seaver at age 25.

www.metspolice.com
@metspolice

Pictures of Shea’s Infield Markers

The missus and I went to the game this afternoon. I have to say that New Shea is really starting to feel like home. I’m not saying that past criticisms are no longer warranted, but I am warming up to it.

After the game I took a few pictures of the markers the Mets have laid out in the parking lot where the Shea infield was.

A few things I noticed:

  • The distance from Home Plate to the outer wall of New Shea doesn’t seem too short (as some have suggested). Of course this is me simply eye-balling it – I am sure someone will eventually go out and do an accurate measurement.
  • I found it interesting that they used the official term for the Pitcher’s Rubber – “Pitcher’s Plate.”
  • I like that they used the outlines of the neon players on each of the markers.

The markers are a very nice touch. Let’s see how clean they stay as cars drive over them.

Shea Markers May 31 2009

www.metspolice.com
@metspolice