Mike asks:
hey shannon..just a thought. why is there almost never any mention of the great 1973 season the mets had?? heck, they were one game away from beating big bad oakland..this was my era as i grew up in the late ’60s, early ’70s and basically lived at shea during this time. we had some great players on the team and of course the best pitching rotation in baseball. we beat the big red machine who were many times better then us (on paper).
i mean the mets honor nl east championship teams more then they do the 1973 mets. any thoughts from you would be great. thanks for listening.
Two words: wild cards.
I got into this team in the late 1970’s. Â All we had was 1969 and 1973. Â ’73 was almost on par with ’69. Â It was almost as if the Mets won in 1973. Â You often heard the names of Tug McGraw, Willie Mays and Yogi Berra.
Even after 1986 came along, ’73 stuck around. Â As fans we celebrated our three great teams. Â The details of the ’73 World Series loss got fuzzy and the focus became Tug. Â I know I would be hard-pressed to press a quiz on that series.
Time went on. Â 1988 happened – the Mets were surely on their way to another World Series until Mike Scoiscia and the Dodgers ruined that. Â The 1988 Mets have largely been forgotten, and after a half century of baseball they are just another division winner.
Another decade – and some wild cards. Â The ’73 team sort of got folded into the ’69 team. Â If you were going to honor Seaver, Koosman, or Harrelson – why not pick ’69.
If you’re over 45 you have ’69. Â If you are 40ish like me you have ’86 and the youngsters have ’00 to be their ’73 and 2006 as a recent semi-success.
That’s my guess…73 is now a subset of 69, and ’00 has taken it’s place.
In the past this is where I would have gone on and on about the lack of Mets history, but the Mets have made great strides by adding the historical bricks, and opening the Hall of Fame museum (although there is no news on that which makes me wonder if it is ready yet.)
What does everyone else think about Mike’s question?