Murray Chass on Piazza and steroids

From Murray Chass posted January 6th

Piazza? I have been accused of being the only writer who has publicly suggested that he used steroids, but talk to any reporter who covered the Mets and they will say of course, he did.

via Murray Chass On Baseball » FOUR-RING CIRCUS COMING TO COOPERSTOWN.

Seems Mike’s name has come up a lot, and I have posted things like this three or four times this week.

I have no issues with Mike.  Never met him.  I’m not out to get him.

I’ll stand by my previous statements that I personally believe there is a prominent past Mets player who took steroids and it will be a sad day if that is ever revealed.  I’ve been watching baseball since 1977 and I know what my eyes saw in 1978 as opposed to 1998 and I’m with Bob Costas in not believing that all the great baseball players came along at once.

Reader comments on Piazza and Rubin

Some comments from the comments section.

Sparks:

I honestly always appreciated Piazza more as a person than a player. He was always a straight-up guy and seemed pretty grounded. As a player, he had the rock star quality, but in any given situation, I’d rather Alfonzo have the bat in his hands.

That said, we’re talking about a umpteenth-round draft pick that swung only with his arms and became the best-hitting catcher in the history of the game, so there’s certainly plenty of reason for suspicion. On the other hand, Piazza didn’t have an especially long career, never won an MVP, and really only meant what he meant to his own team and its fans, so even if he did juice, he’s still not in the same category as Bonds or Clemens in terms of the shadow he cast.

The whole issue is sticky, no way around it. One big question is who was originally cheating vs. who was just trying to keep up with those who were. If I know certain pitchers in my division are ‘roided up, do I just shrug my shoulders about the unfairness of it all, or do I do what I need to do to even things out? I once heard someone on MLB Home Plate hypothesize that Bonds only got on the juice after he saw erstwhile nobodies like Sosa becoming folk heroes and signing big contracts.

The only thing we can ask is that the voters decide what their own criteria is going to be and stick with it from player to player and ballot to ballot.

I maintain that it is silly to have a baseball museum in it and keep out all the famous people and the holders of the major records.   Surely a museum can figure out a way to provide historical context and their exhibit.

UWS Mets Fan:

I suspect Rubin’s point here — as I, too, detect a bit of an edge — is that Alderson seems to be avoiding media interviews where he can be grilled by experienced reporters in favor of “missives” to fans where there is little ability to question or follow-up. If that’s how a beat reporter perceives things, as a fan, I want to know about that. And yes, I realize Alderson has been more open to questions from bloggers, via Twitter, etc. But there is an art in pressing someone for answers when they don’t address a question straight on, and experienced reporters tend to be good at it. So let them do their jobs.

Fair point about the follow-ups.  The blogger format has been one question then pass to the next guy. However, I wouldn’t “go after” Sandy anyway.  (Similarly, when Dave Howard and I catch a game I don’t plan to bust his chops for three hours, I’d actually just like to get to know the guy and talk about baseball.)

I don’t think Sandy is ducking anyone, but I haven’t tried to call him nor have I ever been a beat reporter.   I think Sandy took part in the Mets’ new social media initiatives and Adam sent him a message the way I might say “man, I can’t believe there’s no milk” to nobody while my wife is within earshot.

Dickey’s Donuts

I know y’all probably saw this on Mets Blog, but my Bloggers Handbook says not everyone reads every site.

Long time readers know that the Saturday morning leadoff article always involves donuts, so how could I resist.  Skip to the end for the donuts part.

Sandy’s style bugging the beat reporters?

Left in the comments by @formerdirtdart:

Is it just me, or does Adam Rubin seem just a tad snarky here? http://bit.ly/dSiQ3x
Does the “media” have a problem with the Mets’ pattern of direct communication with their fans? (Thats @formerdirtdart commenting not Adam, the link is Adam.)

Rubin’s tweet was: Sandy Alderson hasn’t made himself very available to members of the media, but there is this missive e-mailed to fans:http://es.pn/e1eI3s

I don’t know Adam Rubin and text (especially when limited to 108 characters or whatever twitter is) lacks nuance and can easily seem harsh.

Breaking down the sentence…”Sandy Alderson hasn’t made himself very available to members of the media” does suggest some personal feeling.  It would have been just as easy to type “Sandy Alderson missive e-mailed to fans..” with the link.

I don’t think the beat guys need to worry, if they are all even worried.  They’ll still get great information by being in the clubhouse and by being around the players.   Sandy isn’t going to be emailing every day “Reyes says he has a cold but will play” and he definitely won’t be emailing things like a hypothetical “this series is make or break for the season” article…so no need to worry if Sandy emails us civilians and says hi.