Black for black’s sake (link)

Uni Watch which does a far better job about ripping black uniform than I’ll ever do has a nice article today (part 2 of 2) about what they call Black for Black’s Sake.

“Black For Black’s Sake” — or BFBS — it’s the second entry in the Uni Watch Glossary. It’s defined in there as “a reference to teams that gratuitously add black to their uniform design even though black was never one of their team colors.” Fittingly, the example is the New York Mets, the poster child for this seemingly endless fashion statement.

Don’t forget, it’s Bark in the Park and a Mr. Met Dash

FormerDirtDart sent this over…and I like being goofy on Saturday…so why not:

It’s also an increasingly rare Kiner Day on channel 11 (I love that Keith gets the weekend off somehow.)   I love Ralph but it’s sunny out and I have lawn and t-ball games to handle, so Howie it is.

Which reminds me – is it me or are the first few minutes of the Mets game sped up.   Wayne sounded like he was on helium or something last night.  I don’t know how the technology works but WFAN usually operates with some sort of delay, when Carton gives the time it’s usually off by like two minutes.  Maybe they don’t want to delay the Mets broadcast and they are catching up somehow.

Oh and WFANners – the MLB App is screwed up.  One commercial is always inaudible.   It’s annoying.

(Next rant will be against ESPN but I feel like going outside now.)

I wonder if Howie Rose still has his Mercury Mets jersey

I was researching something else and stumbles across this photo (from the great Mets by the Numbers site).

It combines everything horrible about the Mets of that time – Fran Healy’s broadcasting AND a Mercury Mets jersey.

Knowing that Howie is a kindred spirit, I wonder what he did with his.

By the way, I would love to have a Mercury Mets cap for the sheer quirkiness.

By the way, major props to SNY.  There were a few years when Mets telecasts were unwatchable, and that was with Howie in the booth.  Cablevision, the home of quality.

Why the Mets should let people sneak down

An article on Mets Fever caught my eye for two reasons.  One, in mentions Lee Mazzilli.  Second, it explains the importance of letting people “sneak down.”

Remember back at Shea, and I mean way back, that late in a game you could move closer to the field?   Here’s what happens when you let a boy do that:

Why am I talking about a game in 1979; because it was the first game I ever attended and based on that experience as a ten year old, I became a Mets fan. I don’t rem. the errors, who scored what runs, what relievers looked bad or even who was on the field other then Mazz.

As the article explains, that experience created a lifelong connection.   I’m sure the Mets have been in back in spades by the author.

The article suggests that maybe the Mets could be less draconian about enforcing the sneak down on rainy nights in a half empty stadium.

I know the argument about the phantom irate fan who is going to show up (for the first time) at 10:15 and go nuts that another fannie is in “his” seat.   On Tuesday I found someone in “my” seat in the uppers (oops, Promenade).  You know what I did?  I sat in one of the 8 other empty seats in that row, and I bet if I had bothered with “excuse me, I think that’s my seat” the nice man would have moved.

I’m going to borrow two more paragraphs from Mets Fever in the interest of spreading the message.   As part of my Honor Among Bloggers creed, please do the right thing and head over to Mets Fever and read the entire article and give  that site the web traffic it deserves.

Around the 7-8th inning with nobody in the stadium, I watched a kid I’d guess was 13-15 y/o, ask an usher if he could go down to watch the rest of the game and the usher said sorry not without a ticket, with a supervisor within earshot. The Dad turned to the kid and said come on, lets go, they’re gonna lose and I don’t want to stand around anymore.

I hope someone from the club reads this and realizes the importance of those types of experiences and realizes they’re going about things on too much of a corporate management style. Just think about how much money this team has earned from me, based on the ushers finding the kids on a slow day and allowing them down near the dugout. When many are saying we’re on the brink of irrelevance in NY the organization has to foster and develop the fanbase not ostracize it and/or allow it to deteriorate even more…

Well said, and again I grabbed the paragraphs in the hope that someone from the club reads it.

Everyone else, click here and read about Mazzilli.

No Mets game for me today, Mrs. Mets Police is making me operate Daddy’s Taxi Service – someone got a nice bargain on Stubhub.  Catch y’all later.

Black ski caps and blue ballcaps?

..I must be a prophet, I actually was at Dunkin as I mentioned in the Bonilla post.

I need someone to explain the Mets uniform thought process to me.

All week the Mets wore various ugly combinations of uniforms.  We saw the hybrids (for the newbies, those are blue/black caps with the NY logo that you can’t see on TV) a few days and on Thursday we saw the dreaded black uniforms and black caps.

On Friday night, the Mets gave away these ski caps.  Y’all see what color they are, right?

So what did the Mets wear?

BLUE.  White pinless with blue caps and blue stirrups.

HOW DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE?

The one night it would make sense to wear black they wear the blue.   I can’t get a straight answer on who is picking the uniforms on any given night, but shouldn’t there be someone to coordinate such things?   Shouldn’t there be some guy in a corner office who says “hey let’s wear the black tonight.”   Even I would have said to wear the black on Friday.

I’m out of my mind with this stuff.   Someone, PLEASE, explain to me why they went with blue on Friday.  (Things you’d never think I would say).

At least they are winning, but the organization does have a way of being maddening.  I guess that’s where I come in.