I stand by my ground that I can’t stand the Los Mets jerseys. Â Why? Â They make no sense. Â It would be like wearing jerseys that say “The Mets.” Â The teams in the Mexican League have jerseys that say “Tigres” not “Los Tigres” so I’ll use that as my argument.
However, JMP threw out something very interesting in the comments yesterday:
I think that it was a reasonable level of protest for the Suns to wear their Los Suns jerseys last night, and I think that it would make sense for the Mets to use their Los Mets jerseys when playing the Diamondbacks as a quiet protest that wouldn’t disrupt the games. (I hate them as much as you do, but as a means of protest, I’d give them a pass.)
Before we get all political, Los Suns is even stupider than Los Mets. Â I know that there’s a Spanish word for sun (“Sol”) and although I’m no Spanish expert I bet there’s a way to pluralize it.
However, we can argue that another time.
I also don’t want to debate politics, immigration, law, or any “hot-button” issues. Â This is just a dopey blog written by a fat guy who has a man crush on Lee Mazzilli and wants the Mets to wear blue caps – let’s keep it that way and take the Arizona argument elsewhere.
What is interesting is JMP’s suggestion.
The Mets don’t play the Diamondbacks until July 19th but wouldn’t it be mighty interesting if they took the field in Los Mets jerseys.
I can’t figure out who decides what the team wears, but what if a few prominent players asked if they could wear Los Mets?
Of course, it would be the black road jersey which stupidly says Mets on a normal day, otherwise they’d have to make up some Nueva York jerseys (which makes sense and would actually be cool civilian wear).
Wouldn’t that be mighty interesting? Â I bet it would get noticed.
Again, let’s keep this discussion to whether or not baseball should be political, this is not the forum for a political debate.